«Orthopaedia.net»: الفرق بين المراجعتين

من ويكيتعمر
اذهب إلى: تصفح، ابحث
(الجهات المشاركة)
(OrthopaedicsOne FAQs)
سطر 306: سطر 306:
 
*    How will OrthopaedicsOne avoid the quality control problems associated with Wikipedia?
 
*    How will OrthopaedicsOne avoid the quality control problems associated with Wikipedia?
  
Where does the content in OrthopaedicsOne come from?
+
===Where does the content in OrthopaedicsOne come from?===
  
 
OrthopaedicsOne has content from three different sources:
 
OrthopaedicsOne has content from three different sources:
سطر 312: سطر 312:
 
     Original articles written by OrthopaedicsOne authors. These are individuals who are residents, fellows, surgeons or allied health professionals and experts in their fields as judged by their peers and by their track record of distinguished research, teaching, writing, and training in their field. You can view our current list of authors here.
 
     Original articles written by OrthopaedicsOne authors. These are individuals who are residents, fellows, surgeons or allied health professionals and experts in their fields as judged by their peers and by their track record of distinguished research, teaching, writing, and training in their field. You can view our current list of authors here.
 
     Content Partners. These are organizations who have reached a formal agreement with OrthopaedicsOne to have their existing material published in OrthopaedicsOne. In most cases, such material is published verbatim from the Partner organization, with some editing for style and length to make the entry consistent with OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. Remaining consistent with the OrthopaedicsOne governance guidelines, once the entry is up on OrthopaedicsOne, authors may then add to or edit that material. Every entry from a Content Partner is assigned to, and must be approved by, at least one Section Editor. You can view our current list of Content Partners here.
 
     Content Partners. These are organizations who have reached a formal agreement with OrthopaedicsOne to have their existing material published in OrthopaedicsOne. In most cases, such material is published verbatim from the Partner organization, with some editing for style and length to make the entry consistent with OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. Remaining consistent with the OrthopaedicsOne governance guidelines, once the entry is up on OrthopaedicsOne, authors may then add to or edit that material. Every entry from a Content Partner is assigned to, and must be approved by, at least one Section Editor. You can view our current list of Content Partners here.
    Free and Open Content Sources. The typical example here is a government agency whose work rests fully in the public domain, such as many federal government publications. Other examples include non-profit and educational organizations whose copyright allows free use for educational and non-commercial purposes. In most cases, such material is published verbatim from the organization, with some editing for style and length to make the entry consistent with OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. Remaining consistent with the OrthopaedicsOne governance guidelines, once the entry is up on OrthopaedicsOne, authors may then add to or edit that material. Every entry from a Content Source is assigned to, and must be approved by, at least one Section Editor.
+
 
 +
Free and Open Content Sources. The typical example here is a government agency whose work rests fully in the public domain, such as many federal government publications. Other examples include non-profit and educational organizations whose copyright allows free use for educational and non-commercial purposes. In most cases, such material is published verbatim from the organization, with some editing for style and length to make the entry consistent with OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. Remaining consistent with the OrthopaedicsOne governance guidelines, once the entry is up on OrthopaedicsOne, authors may then add to or edit that material. Every entry from a Content Source is assigned to, and must be approved by, at least one Section Editor.
  
 
Every article from a Content Partner or a free and open Content source carries this disclaimer:
 
Every article from a Content Partner or a free and open Content source carries this disclaimer:
  
 
This article is taken wholly from, or contains information that was originally published by, the <organization name here>. Section editors and authors for the OrthopaedicsOne may have edited its content or added new information. The use of information from the <organization name here> should not be construed as support for or endorsement by that organization for any new information added by OrthopaedicsOne personnel, or for any editing of the original content.
 
This article is taken wholly from, or contains information that was originally published by, the <organization name here>. Section editors and authors for the OrthopaedicsOne may have edited its content or added new information. The use of information from the <organization name here> should not be construed as support for or endorsement by that organization for any new information added by OrthopaedicsOne personnel, or for any editing of the original content.
Who are the authors of original content in OrthopaedicsOne?
 
  
 +
===Who are the authors of original content in OrthopaedicsOne?===
 
Authors are medical students, residents, fellows, surgeons and allied health professionals with an interest in musculoskeletal health. Many authors are experts in their fields as judged by their peers and by their track record of distinguished research, teaching, writing, training, and public outreach within their area of expertise. This community of scholars includes scientists and educators at major academic universities as well as private practice surgeons, industry representatives, government agencies and professional organisations who are appropriately qualified. You can view the current list of members here.
 
Authors are medical students, residents, fellows, surgeons and allied health professionals with an interest in musculoskeletal health. Many authors are experts in their fields as judged by their peers and by their track record of distinguished research, teaching, writing, training, and public outreach within their area of expertise. This community of scholars includes scientists and educators at major academic universities as well as private practice surgeons, industry representatives, government agencies and professional organisations who are appropriately qualified. You can view the current list of members here.
Who decides who can contribute?
+
 
 +
===Who decides who can contribute?===
  
 
The Managing Editors of the OrthopaedicsOne review the qualifications of all applicants to the OrthopaedicsOne community. We hope to expand this role to a committee comprised of a diverse group of respected scientists and educators, and the organizations, agencies, and institutions for which they work.
 
The Managing Editors of the OrthopaedicsOne review the qualifications of all applicants to the OrthopaedicsOne community. We hope to expand this role to a committee comprised of a diverse group of respected scientists and educators, and the organizations, agencies, and institutions for which they work.
How do I know I can trust the information in OrthopaedicsOne?
 
  
 +
===How do I know I can trust the information in OrthopaedicsOne?===
 
OrthopaedicsOne is working towards a rigorous content-review process that insures that its articles are up-to-date, fair, and accurate.
 
OrthopaedicsOne is working towards a rigorous content-review process that insures that its articles are up-to-date, fair, and accurate.
  
    Authors are restricted to individuals who have applied to, and been approved by, the Managing Editors or invited by an approved OrthopaedicsOne member.
+
Authors are restricted to individuals who have applied to, and been approved by, the Managing Editors or invited by an approved OrthopaedicsOne member.
    The actual content of an article is determined by groups of individuals working together on the wiki. An article may start with an individual or small team, but once up in the wiki, the content can, and will, be edited by other individuals who have an interest in the subject and the motivation to improve the article. An article eventually will have many more topic editors, authors, and copy editors than when it began. This process will produce an article that is far superior to what any single individual could possibly create.
+
 
    A Section Editor must review an article released to the public. A Section Editor reviews an article for general content, accuracy, clarity, and adherence to OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. A Section Editor also resolves content-level disputes authoritatively and coherently, though with input from the contributors, and determines the appropriateness of deleting mediocre work.
+
The actual content of an article is determined by groups of individuals working together on the wiki. An article may start with an individual or small team, but once up in the wiki, the content can, and will, be edited by other individuals who have an interest in the subject and the motivation to improve the article. An article eventually will have many more topic editors, authors, and copy editors than when it began. This process will produce an article that is far superior to what any single individual could possibly create.
 +
 
 +
A Section Editor must review an article released to the public. A Section Editor reviews an article for general content, accuracy, clarity, and adherence to OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. A Section Editor also resolves content-level disputes authoritatively and coherently, though with input from the contributors, and determines the appropriateness of deleting mediocre work.
 
     All work in OrthopaedicsOne is attributed to an individual, not an IP address or a user name. This motivates individuals to do their very best work, as it does in traditional scholarly work, and will discourage the explicit acts of sabotage that plague other electronic resources where anonymity is the norm.
 
     All work in OrthopaedicsOne is attributed to an individual, not an IP address or a user name. This motivates individuals to do their very best work, as it does in traditional scholarly work, and will discourage the explicit acts of sabotage that plague other electronic resources where anonymity is the norm.
  
How do articles get written?
+
===How do articles get written?===
 
 
 
Articles are written by authors on a wiki . A wiki is website or similar online resource that allows users to add and edit content collectively, including the ability to change text written by other users. Thus, wikis are well-suited for collaborative authoring. The name derives from the Hawaiian term wiki, meaning "quick", "fast", or "to hasten."
 
Articles are written by authors on a wiki . A wiki is website or similar online resource that allows users to add and edit content collectively, including the ability to change text written by other users. Thus, wikis are well-suited for collaborative authoring. The name derives from the Hawaiian term wiki, meaning "quick", "fast", or "to hasten."
  
 
This wiki software enables collaborative article development by a community of scholars, as well as a content review process. Any approved member is free to add any entries that lie within their area of expertise, or edit existing articles in those subject areas. Articles are in a constant state of expansion, revision and enhancement as new authors join and as existing authors update their work.
 
This wiki software enables collaborative article development by a community of scholars, as well as a content review process. Any approved member is free to add any entries that lie within their area of expertise, or edit existing articles in those subject areas. Articles are in a constant state of expansion, revision and enhancement as new authors join and as existing authors update their work.
Is a wiki really necessary?
 
  
 +
===Is a wiki really necessary?===
 
A restricted-access wiki is an excellent tool to produce an information resource that:
 
A restricted-access wiki is an excellent tool to produce an information resource that:
 
+
*     is completely Web-based;
     is completely Web-based;
+
*     covers an enormous range of topics related to the environment;
     covers an enormous range of topics related to the environment;
+
*     is kept constantly up-to-date across diverse fields;
     is kept constantly up-to-date across diverse fields;
+
*     is completely free to the public;
     is completely free to the public;
+
*     includes input from scores of traditional disciplines and professions, and thousands of qualified contributors; and
     includes input from scores of traditional disciplines and professions, and thousands of qualified contributors; and
+
*     openly attributes all significant contributions to individuals and their institutions.
     openly attributes all significant contributions to individuals and their institutions.
 
  
 
Article quality can be expected to be remarkably high in an adequately active wiki project staffed by experts, for several reasons. Most importantly, the contributors will be well-educated specialists. Also, the work is immediately publicly visible and, therefore, people will tend to post better work than they would otherwise. Finally, the energy of so many scholars, who already know and respect each other, will help motivate all of them to do their best.
 
Article quality can be expected to be remarkably high in an adequately active wiki project staffed by experts, for several reasons. Most importantly, the contributors will be well-educated specialists. Also, the work is immediately publicly visible and, therefore, people will tend to post better work than they would otherwise. Finally, the energy of so many scholars, who already know and respect each other, will help motivate all of them to do their best.
What about controversial topics?
 
  
 +
===What about controversial topics?===
 
OrthopaedicsOne has an explicit policy regarding neutrality and fairness, the details of which can be found here. In a nutshell, the policy requires that:
 
OrthopaedicsOne has an explicit policy regarding neutrality and fairness, the details of which can be found here. In a nutshell, the policy requires that:
  
    OrthopaedicsOne articles, when touching upon any issue of controversy, must represent every different view on a subject that attracts a significant portion of adherents, with each such view and its arguments or evidence being expressed as fairly and sympathetically as possible.
+
OrthopaedicsOne articles, when touching upon any issue of controversy, must represent every different view on a subject that attracts a significant portion of adherents, with each such view and its arguments or evidence being expressed as fairly and sympathetically as possible.
 +
 
 
     OrthopaedicsOne itself does not advocate positions on political issues; it is both non-partisan and non-sectarian.
 
     OrthopaedicsOne itself does not advocate positions on political issues; it is both non-partisan and non-sectarian.
    OrthopaedicsOne does not use phraseology or tone that elevates or deprecates particular perspectives or people holding a particular perspective.
 
    OrthopaedicsOne recognizes uncertainties in data, assumptions, interpretation, and understanding.
 
    As access to the broadest array of knowledge has many salutary effects, OrthopaedicsOne shall be strongly disposed to include rather than exclude content.
 
    When some content both has no discernible and unique benefit to the advancement of knowledge, and has significant potential to harm the health or moral character of individuals, or human society at large, it may be excluded.
 
  
What's the difference between Section Editor, Lead Author, and Contributing Author?
+
OrthopaedicsOne does not use phraseology or tone that elevates or deprecates particular perspectives or people holding a particular perspective.
 +
 
 +
OrthopaedicsOne recognizes uncertainties in data, assumptions, interpretation, and understanding.
  
 +
As access to the broadest array of knowledge has many salutary effects, OrthopaedicsOne shall be strongly disposed to include rather than exclude content.
 +
 +
When some content both has no discernible and unique benefit to the advancement of knowledge, and has significant potential to harm the health or moral character of individuals, or human society at large, it may be excluded.
 +
 +
What's the difference between Section Editor, Lead Author, and Contributing Author===?===
 
Lead Author status is given to someone who starts a truly excellent article, or who significantly expands a previously incomplete article, making it into an excellent, usable, and complete article. Contributing Authors are those who write or significantly rework the content. Section Editors are those who review an entry and decide if it is ready to be published, arbitrate disputes, and help set overall editorial policy.
 
Lead Author status is given to someone who starts a truly excellent article, or who significantly expands a previously incomplete article, making it into an excellent, usable, and complete article. Contributing Authors are those who write or significantly rework the content. Section Editors are those who review an entry and decide if it is ready to be published, arbitrate disputes, and help set overall editorial policy.
Can I use material published in the OrthopaedicsOne?
 
  
 +
Can I use material published in the OrthopaedicsOne===?===
 
The text in OrthopaedicsOne is meant to be freely available to users who may copy, modify and distribute that content, so long as the new version grants the same freedoms to others and attributes the content to the authors of the OrthopaedicsOne article used. To achieve this goal, the text contained in OrthopaedicsOne is licensed to the public under the Creative Commons license known as Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 . This license permits anyone to (1) copy, distribute, and display your work, (2) work remix, tweak, and build upon your work, without commercial use of your work, subject to these conditions:
 
The text in OrthopaedicsOne is meant to be freely available to users who may copy, modify and distribute that content, so long as the new version grants the same freedoms to others and attributes the content to the authors of the OrthopaedicsOne article used. To achieve this goal, the text contained in OrthopaedicsOne is licensed to the public under the Creative Commons license known as Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 . This license permits anyone to (1) copy, distribute, and display your work, (2) work remix, tweak, and build upon your work, without commercial use of your work, subject to these conditions:
 +
* Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
 +
*    Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
 +
*    Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one.
 +
*    The full text of the Creative Commons license is available here.
 +
 +
How is OrthopaedicsOne different than Wikipedia===?===
 +
Virtually anyone can add, delete, or change content in Wikipedia. In OrthopaedicsOne, this privilege is restricted to medical students, residents, fellows, surgeons and allied health professionals with an interest in orthopaedic surgery and musculoskeletal health, many of whom are judged by their peers to be experts in their fields.
 +
 +
Content on Wikipedia is determined by the equally-weighted voices of all those who want and choose to contribute. OrthopaedicsOne is part scholarly-democracy and part rigorous-meritocracy. OrthopaedicsOne is democratic in the sense that many content and governance decisions are made with input from many diverse scholars. But, OrthopaedicsOne is also a rigorous meritocracy in the sense that important, overreaching editorial decisions are made by the Managing Editors and the Section Editorsand applied to each and every article.
 +
 +
In Wikipedia, there is a view that the involvement of scholars is not necessary to produce an authoritative article. OrthopaedicsOne is based on the premise that input from scholars is essential to produce trustworthy information about orthopaedic surgery and musculoskeletal health.
 +
 +
Authorship in Wikipedia is anonymous. All work in OrthopaedicsOne is attributed to the individual who did it.
 +
 +
Changes to Wikipedia articles are viewable by the public instantly. Changes to OrthopaedicsOne are viewable instantly, but article versions must be reviewed by a Section Editor.
 +
 +
The restricted access nature of OrthopaedicsOne in combination with the content review process significantly reduces the opportunity and means for bad entries to start in the first place, as well as the length of time they could go undetected.
 +
 +
The taxonomy of OrthopaedicsOne organizes articles according to a logical structure developed by experts.
  
    Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
+
How will OrthopaedicsOne avoid the quality control problems associated with Wikipedia===?===
    Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
 
    Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one.
 
    The full text of the Creative Commons license is available here.
 
  
How is OrthopaedicsOne different than Wikipedia?
+
We restrict access to the wiki, and hence all authorship, to experts who have been vetted by other members of the editorial workgroup and the Managing Editors .
  
    Virtually anyone can add, delete, or change content in Wikipedia. In OrthopaedicsOne, this privilege is restricted to medical students, residents, fellows, surgeons and allied health professionals with an interest in orthopaedic surgery and musculoskeletal health, many of whom are judged by their peers to be experts in their fields.
+
With the freedom and ability to have entries written and edited by multiple authors, there should be strong self-policing and quality control. The incremental and iterative work on entries by a group of self-organizing experts should produce a higher quality product than a single author could ever produce.
    Content on Wikipedia is determined by the equally-weighted voices of all those who want and choose to contribute. OrthopaedicsOne is part scholarly-democracy and part rigorous-meritocracy. OrthopaedicsOne is democratic in the sense that many content and governance decisions are made with input from many diverse scholars. But, OrthopaedicsOne is also a rigorous meritocracy in the sense that important, overreaching editorial decisions are made by the Managing Editors and the Section Editorsand applied to each and every article.
 
    In Wikipedia, there is a view that the involvement of scholars is not necessary to produce an authoritative article. OrthopaedicsOne is based on the premise that input from scholars is essential to produce trustworthy information about orthopaedic surgery and musculoskeletal health.
 
    Authorship in Wikipedia is anonymous. All work in OrthopaedicsOne is attributed to the individual who did it.
 
    Changes to Wikipedia articles are viewable by the public instantly. Changes to OrthopaedicsOne are viewable instantly, but article versions must be reviewed by a Section Editor.
 
    The restricted access nature of OrthopaedicsOne in combination with the content review process significantly reduces the opportunity and means for bad entries to start in the first place, as well as the length of time they could go undetected.
 
    The taxonomy of OrthopaedicsOne organizes articles according to a logical structure developed by experts.
 
  
How will OrthopaedicsOne avoid the quality control problems associated with Wikipedia?
+
All articles published have to be reviewed and approved by a Section Editor(s).
  
    We restrict access to the wiki, and hence all authorship, to experts who have been vetted by other members of the editorial workgroup and the Managing Editors .
+
All work in OrthopaedicsOne is attributed to an individual, not an IP address or a user name as is the policy in Wikipedia. This will motivate individuals to do their very best work, as it does in traditional scholarly work, and will it discourage the explicit acts of sabotage that plague other electronic resources where anonymity is the norm.
    With the freedom and ability to have entries written and edited by multiple authors, there should be strong self-policing and quality control. The incremental and iterative work on entries by a group of self-organizing experts should produce a higher quality product than a single author could ever produce.
 
    All articles published have to be reviewed and approved by a Section Editor(s).
 
    All work in OrthopaedicsOne is attributed to an individual, not an IP address or a user name as is the policy in Wikipedia. This will motivate individuals to do their very best work, as it does in traditional scholarly work, and will it discourage the explicit acts of sabotage that plague other electronic resources where anonymity is the norm.
 
  
 
==الإختلاف مع ويكيتعمر==
 
==الإختلاف مع ويكيتعمر==

مراجعة 15:44، 29 أكتوبر 2015

موسوعة طب وجراحة العظام الحرة [Orthopaedicsone http://www.orthopaedicsone.com/display/Main/Home?atl_token=4c22295875045b444cd106f61e7bf0c3fa98cb4d]

موسوعة طب وجراحة العظام الحرة [Orthopaedicsone http://www.orthopaedicsone.com/display/Main/Home?atl_token=4c22295875045b444cd106f61e7bf0c3fa98cb4d] مرخصة تحت رخصة الإبداع المشاع وبالتالي تم نقل بعض محتويات صفحاتها هنا للفائدة (مع ذكر المرجع)


الإسم الرسمي

Orthopaedia.net إنتقلت إلى http://www.orthopaedicsone.com

الوصف الرسمي

Introduction to OrthopaedicsOne[1]

OrthopaedicsOne is a collaborative orthopaedic knowledge network, a repository of educational materials, and a professional network for the exchange of information.

By harnessing the power of the OrthopaedicsOne digital publishing platform, you can create and share articles, videos, and other documents with colleagues from around the world.

If you are looking for a better way to share, communicate, and collaborate, OrthopaedicsOne has the essential features for you:

  • Contribute an article, video, presentation, image, news, or case
  • Create a blog or comment on a blog post
  • Ask the community a question or provide your expert opinion
  • Share your viewpoint on a point-counterpoint debate
  • Invite your fellows, residents and colleagues to join

OrthopaedicsOne is much more than an orthopaedic wiki. Click on the Features to find out more!

What is OrthopaedicsOne?[2]

OrthopaedicsOne is the collaborative orthopaedic knowledge network, a repository of educational materials and a professional network for the exchange of information. OrthopaedicsOne is built on a powerful collaboration platform that lets you create and share articles, videos, and documents with your colleagues.

At a simple level, think of OrthopaedicsOne as a knowledge sharing portal that UNITES stakeholders across orthopaedics and musculoskeletal medicine.

Surgeons, residents, medical students, institutions, industry, publishers and societies can all benefit from the OrthopaedicsOne collaboration platform. Learn what OrthopaedicsOne can do for you.

Who is behind OrthopaedicsOne?[3]

OrthopedicsOne is the brain child of Co-Founders Christian Veillette and Joseph Bernstein and development is supported by Sponsoring Organizations.

Atlassian supports our efforts by contributing Confluence, the enterprise wiki platform, for our development. Atlassian is an innovative Australian software company providing enterprise software solutions to the world's leading organisations. How OrthopaedicsOne Differs from a Textbook

  • The table of contents is not fixed
  • Anybody can write
  • Anybody can edit
  • Anybody can create and share articles, videos, and documents with colleagues or the community.

OrthopaedicsOne is consider a closed community, where "Anybody" refers to "Any Member" of the OrthopaedicsOne community. Membership is open to all orthopaedic students, residents, fellows, surgeons or allied musculoskeletal health professionals.

The collaboration platform and open knowledge model should allow OrthopedicsOne to be the most up-to-date, accurate and useful education tool in the world for musculoskeletal medicine and orthopedic surgery.

الرسالة والأهداف[4]

Mission

To provide a trusted, comprehensive and open peer-reviewed on-line collaborative knowledgebase in musculoskeletal medicine and orthopaedic surgery

To harness The Wisdom of Crowds for improved education, research and patient care

To provide an integrated professional network and foster knowledge transfer and collaboration across the orthopaedic community


تاريخ إطلاق الأداة

2007 September[5]

الجهات المشاركةParticipating Groups[6]

Orthopaedia.net is a unique coalition of healthcare organizations, industry, government and individuals who care about improving orthopaedic education and musculoskeletal health. We thank all who are supporting and participating in this Project.

You will find Participating Groups listed here, along with links to their web sites, where you can find out more about their own initiatives.

  • Organizations
  • Government
  • Corporate
  • Media
  • Chiropractic Colleges
  • Medical Schools
  • Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine
  • Managing Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Medical Illustrators
  • Content Partners
  • Participating Groups
  • Advisory Board
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • White Papers and Case Studies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Creative Commons License
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Author Credit
  • How to Write an Article
  • How to Edit an Article
  • Citation Methods
  • How to Insert Figures
  • How to Watermark an Image
  • Mobile Interface
  • Peer Review Workflow
  • Personal Space Templates
  • Video Tutorials
  • Contact Us

Managing Editors[7]

Joseph Bernstein, MD, MS, FACS Co-Founder & Managing Editor Director of Education, OrthopaedicsOne Clinical Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pennsylvania Christian Veillette

Christian Veillette MD, MSc, FRCS(C) Co-Founder & Managing Editor Director of Technology, OrthopaedicsOne Assistant Professor University of Toronto

[8]Editorial Board

Editorial Roles

Editor

The Editor is responsible for ensuring the overall quality of content within the section. This includes:

  • Resolving all content-level disputes authoritatively and coherently with input from contributors
  • Determining the appropriateness of deleting mediocre work.
  • Working closely with the OrthopaedicsOne staff on strategic development, including topics to be covered
  • Recruiting Associate Editors to assist in soliciting and reviewing content
  • Identifying and/or approving authors from whom to solicit content
  • Assigning content solicitation, development, and review to the Associate Editors
  • Working with the Associate Editors to ensure that content in the section is fully integrated and linked
  • Appointing Associate Editors to take responsibility for specific content areas, such as Videos, Presentations, Images, Conditions, Operative Techniques, Cases, and Patient Education, at the Editor’s discretion
  • Assigning Associate Editors to mentor Assistant Editors

The Editor reports to the Director of Editorial Development.

Associate Editors

Associate Editors work together and with the Editor to achieve OrthopaedicsOne’s content goals. This includes:

  • Recommending authors to contribute content
  • Soliciting content from colleagues and peers to populate the site
  • Reviewing and approving content for accuracy, clarity, and adherence to OrthopaedicsOne guidelines on an ongoing basis (new content and revisions to existing content)
  • Working with authors to improve content as needed

At the Editor’s discretion, Associate Editors may be assigned to recruit and review content for specific content areas, such as Videos, Presentations, Images, Conditions, Operative Techniques, Cases, and Patient Education. An Associate Editor may also be paired with one or more Assistant Editors to provide mentorship in medical publishing.

Associate Editors report to the Editor.

Assistant Editors

  • Assistant Editors are fellows, residents, and medical students who work under the direction of an Associate Editor to gain experience in medical publishing. At the discretion of the Associate Editor, they may assist in soliciting content, research and write articles, and provide initial peer review

Assistant Editors report to their assigned Associate Editor.

Medical Illustrators

Professional artists who interpret and create visual material to help record and disseminate medical, biological and related knowledge on Orthopaedia.NET.

Current Editorial Board

نموذج لهيئة تحرير موسوعة طب وجراحة العظام الحرة Orthopaedicsone [1]

Content Partners

Content Partners are organizations that have a formal agreement to have their existing material published on OrthopaedicsOne. In most cases, such material is published verbatim from the Partner organization's material, with some editing for style and length to make the entry consistent with OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. Remaining consistent with the OrthopaedicsOne Governance Guidelines, once the entry has been added to OrthopaedicsOne, community members may add to or edit that material. Every entry from a Content Partner is assigned to, and must be approved by, at least one Section Editor .

Every article from a Content Partner carries this disclaimer:

This article is taken wholly from, or contains information that was originally published by, the (organization name here)... Topic editors and authors for OrthopaedicsOne may have edited its content or added new information. The use of information from the (organization name here) should not be construed as support for or endorsement by that organization for any new information added by OrthopaedicsOne members, or for any editing of the original content.

Interested in becoming a Content Partner? Complete the Content Partner Sign Up Form

[9]Participating Groups

Orthopaedia.NET is a unique coalition of healthcare organizations, industry, government and individuals who care about improving orthopaedic education and musculoskeletal health. We thank all who are supporting and participating in this Project.

You will find Participating Groups listed here, along with links to their web sites, where you can find out more about their own initiatives.

  • Organizations
  • Government
  • Corporate
  • Media
  • Chiropractic Colleges
  • Medical Schools
  • Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine

[10]Advisory Board

The Advisory Board is an international network of experts who have agreed to give Orthopaedia.NET meaningful help on a regular basis in many different areas, including law, organizational development, technology, policy, and outreach. Their abilities, experience, and knowledge were selected for how they complement a particular Orthopaedia.NET project, or the organization as a whole.

The Advisory Board advises the Orthopaedia.NET Management Team in its strategic decision-making process and in its day-to-day work. Sometimes questions will be posed to the whole group, sometimes individual members will be consulted.

[11]Sponsoring Organizations

Sponsoring/Supporting Organizations support the development of OrthopaedicsOne.

  1. ISOST: The mission of the Internet Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (ISOST) is to improve the quality of orthopaedic information on the Internet by providing a gateway, at all levels, to patient information, teaching material, CME, current research and discussion, by posting high quality orthopaedic content, by attracting onto the Internet a wider range of material and by setting standards for content quality.
  2. Atlassian supports our efforts by contributing Confluence, the enterprise wiki, to our organization. Atlassian is an innovative Australian software company providing enterprise software solutions to the world's leading organisations. Atlassian's newest software product, Confluence is a knowledge management tool designed to make it easy for a team to communicate: sharing information, collaborating on documents and brainstorming ideas, all in a single web-based location.
  3. Customware supports our efforts by contributing several plugins which enhance the core functionality of our platform. Put simply - Customware is the services engine room that helps fast-growing software companies scale, by providing a cloud-based software platform and the professional services that their customers require to be successful.


  • * Frequently Asked Questions
  • * White Papers and Case Studies
  • * Disclaimer
  • * Privacy Policy
  • * Creative Commons License
  • * Copyright Infringement
  • * Instructions for Authors
  • Author Credit
  • How to Write an Article
  • How to Edit an Article
  • Citation Methods
  • How to Insert Figures
  • How to Watermark an Image
  • Mobile Interface
  • Peer Review Workflow
  • Personal Space Templates
  • Video Tutorials
  • Contact Us
  • Skip to end of metadata

Content Partners

Content Partners are organizations that have a formal agreement to have their existing material published on OrthopaedicsOne. In most cases, such material is published verbatim from the Partner organization's material, with some editing for style and length to make the entry consistent with OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. Remaining consistent with the OrthopaedicsOne Governance Guidelines, once the entry has been added to OrthopaedicsOne, community members may add to or edit that material. Every entry from a Content Partner is assigned to, and must be approved by, at least one Section Editor . Every article from a Content Partner carries this disclaimer:

This article is taken wholly from, or contains information that was originally published by, the (organization name here)... Topic editors and authors for OrthopaedicsOne may have edited its content or added new information. The use of information from the (organization name here) should not be construed as support for or endorsement by that organization for any new information added by OrthopaedicsOne members, or for any editing of the original content.

Interested in becoming a Content Partner? Complete the Content Partner Sign Up Form

[12]Current Content Partners

  • Professional Associations
    • American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons
    • Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons
    • Canadian Orthopaedic Association
    • International Congress on Joint Reconstruction
    • Musculoskeletal Tumor Society
    • Orthopaedic Trauma Association
    • Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America
  • Institutions

Banner Good Samaritan-Division of Orthopaedic Surgery**

    • Flinders University- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery
    • Miami Sarcoma Group
    • University of Pennsylvania-Division of Orthopaedic Surgery
    • University of Toronto-Division of Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Content Publishers
    • CHE Course-Charting the proper course
    • OrthoEvidence
    • SpringerLink
  • Industry
    • لا يوجد
  • Government
    • لا يوجد

تنظيم العمل

المشاركة[13]

Collaboration

Hold discussions, create documents, share knowledge, blog ... in one place.

Knowledge Management

Consolidate your institutions orthopaedic knowledge in a single, searchable, structured repository.

Publication

Create and publish online articles the efficient way.

الإشارة للأداة

التمويل

Sponsoring Organizations[14]

Sponsoring/Supporting Organizations support the development of OrthopaedicsOne.

ISOST

The mission of the Internet Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (ISOST) is to improve the quality of orthopaedic information on the Internet by providing a gateway, at all levels, to patient information, teaching material, CME, current research and discussion, by posting high quality orthopaedic content, by attracting onto the Internet a wider range of material and by setting standards for content quality.

Atlassian

Atlassian supports our efforts by contributing Confluence, the enterprise wiki, to our organization.

Atlassian is an innovative Australian software company providing enterprise software solutions to the world's leading organisations. Atlassian's newest software product, Confluence is a knowledge management tool designed to make it easy for a team to communicate: sharing information, collaborating on documents and brainstorming ideas, all in a single web-based location.

Customware

Customware supports our efforts by contributing several plugins which enhance the core functionality of our platform.

Put simply - Customware is the services engine room that helps fast-growing software companies scale, by providing a cloud-based software platform and the professional services that their customers require to be successful.

الترخيص

Creative Commons License[15]

Creative Commons (CC) provides free tools that let authors, scientists, artists, and educators easily mark their creative work with the freedoms they want it to carry.

Creative Commons defines the spectrum of possibilities between full copyright — all rights reserved — and the public domain — no rights reserved. Our licenses help you keep your copyright while inviting certain uses of your work — a "some rights reserved" copyright.

The primary reason for selecting a Creative Commons License was to breakdown the knowledge translation barriers related to standard copyright.

The current copyright for Orthopaedia.NET is a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License .

رابط

التلاقي مع ويكيتعمر

OrthopaedicsOne FAQs

Contents[16]

  • Where does the content in OrthopaedicsOne come from?
  • Who are the authors of original content in OrthopaedicsOne?
  • Who decides who can contribute?
  • How do I know I can trust the information in OrthopaedicsOne?
  • How do articles get written?
  • Is a wiki really necessary?
  • What about controversial topics?
  • What's the difference between Section Editor, Lead Author, and Contributing Author?
  • Can I use material published in the OrthopaedicsOne?
  • How is OrthopaedicsOne different than Wikipedia?
  • How will OrthopaedicsOne avoid the quality control problems associated with Wikipedia?

Where does the content in OrthopaedicsOne come from?

OrthopaedicsOne has content from three different sources:

   Original articles written by OrthopaedicsOne authors. These are individuals who are residents, fellows, surgeons or allied health professionals and experts in their fields as judged by their peers and by their track record of distinguished research, teaching, writing, and training in their field. You can view our current list of authors here.
   Content Partners. These are organizations who have reached a formal agreement with OrthopaedicsOne to have their existing material published in OrthopaedicsOne. In most cases, such material is published verbatim from the Partner organization, with some editing for style and length to make the entry consistent with OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. Remaining consistent with the OrthopaedicsOne governance guidelines, once the entry is up on OrthopaedicsOne, authors may then add to or edit that material. Every entry from a Content Partner is assigned to, and must be approved by, at least one Section Editor. You can view our current list of Content Partners here.

Free and Open Content Sources. The typical example here is a government agency whose work rests fully in the public domain, such as many federal government publications. Other examples include non-profit and educational organizations whose copyright allows free use for educational and non-commercial purposes. In most cases, such material is published verbatim from the organization, with some editing for style and length to make the entry consistent with OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. Remaining consistent with the OrthopaedicsOne governance guidelines, once the entry is up on OrthopaedicsOne, authors may then add to or edit that material. Every entry from a Content Source is assigned to, and must be approved by, at least one Section Editor.

Every article from a Content Partner or a free and open Content source carries this disclaimer:

This article is taken wholly from, or contains information that was originally published by, the <organization name here>. Section editors and authors for the OrthopaedicsOne may have edited its content or added new information. The use of information from the <organization name here> should not be construed as support for or endorsement by that organization for any new information added by OrthopaedicsOne personnel, or for any editing of the original content.

Who are the authors of original content in OrthopaedicsOne?

Authors are medical students, residents, fellows, surgeons and allied health professionals with an interest in musculoskeletal health. Many authors are experts in their fields as judged by their peers and by their track record of distinguished research, teaching, writing, training, and public outreach within their area of expertise. This community of scholars includes scientists and educators at major academic universities as well as private practice surgeons, industry representatives, government agencies and professional organisations who are appropriately qualified. You can view the current list of members here.

Who decides who can contribute?

The Managing Editors of the OrthopaedicsOne review the qualifications of all applicants to the OrthopaedicsOne community. We hope to expand this role to a committee comprised of a diverse group of respected scientists and educators, and the organizations, agencies, and institutions for which they work.

How do I know I can trust the information in OrthopaedicsOne?

OrthopaedicsOne is working towards a rigorous content-review process that insures that its articles are up-to-date, fair, and accurate.

Authors are restricted to individuals who have applied to, and been approved by, the Managing Editors or invited by an approved OrthopaedicsOne member.

The actual content of an article is determined by groups of individuals working together on the wiki. An article may start with an individual or small team, but once up in the wiki, the content can, and will, be edited by other individuals who have an interest in the subject and the motivation to improve the article. An article eventually will have many more topic editors, authors, and copy editors than when it began. This process will produce an article that is far superior to what any single individual could possibly create.

A Section Editor must review an article released to the public. A Section Editor reviews an article for general content, accuracy, clarity, and adherence to OrthopaedicsOne guidelines. A Section Editor also resolves content-level disputes authoritatively and coherently, though with input from the contributors, and determines the appropriateness of deleting mediocre work.

   All work in OrthopaedicsOne is attributed to an individual, not an IP address or a user name. This motivates individuals to do their very best work, as it does in traditional scholarly work, and will discourage the explicit acts of sabotage that plague other electronic resources where anonymity is the norm.

How do articles get written?

Articles are written by authors on a wiki . A wiki is website or similar online resource that allows users to add and edit content collectively, including the ability to change text written by other users. Thus, wikis are well-suited for collaborative authoring. The name derives from the Hawaiian term wiki, meaning "quick", "fast", or "to hasten."

This wiki software enables collaborative article development by a community of scholars, as well as a content review process. Any approved member is free to add any entries that lie within their area of expertise, or edit existing articles in those subject areas. Articles are in a constant state of expansion, revision and enhancement as new authors join and as existing authors update their work.

Is a wiki really necessary?

A restricted-access wiki is an excellent tool to produce an information resource that:

  • is completely Web-based;
  • covers an enormous range of topics related to the environment;
  • is kept constantly up-to-date across diverse fields;
  • is completely free to the public;
  • includes input from scores of traditional disciplines and professions, and thousands of qualified contributors; and
  • openly attributes all significant contributions to individuals and their institutions.

Article quality can be expected to be remarkably high in an adequately active wiki project staffed by experts, for several reasons. Most importantly, the contributors will be well-educated specialists. Also, the work is immediately publicly visible and, therefore, people will tend to post better work than they would otherwise. Finally, the energy of so many scholars, who already know and respect each other, will help motivate all of them to do their best.

What about controversial topics?

OrthopaedicsOne has an explicit policy regarding neutrality and fairness, the details of which can be found here. In a nutshell, the policy requires that:

OrthopaedicsOne articles, when touching upon any issue of controversy, must represent every different view on a subject that attracts a significant portion of adherents, with each such view and its arguments or evidence being expressed as fairly and sympathetically as possible.

   OrthopaedicsOne itself does not advocate positions on political issues; it is both non-partisan and non-sectarian.

OrthopaedicsOne does not use phraseology or tone that elevates or deprecates particular perspectives or people holding a particular perspective.

OrthopaedicsOne recognizes uncertainties in data, assumptions, interpretation, and understanding.

As access to the broadest array of knowledge has many salutary effects, OrthopaedicsOne shall be strongly disposed to include rather than exclude content.

When some content both has no discernible and unique benefit to the advancement of knowledge, and has significant potential to harm the health or moral character of individuals, or human society at large, it may be excluded.

What's the difference between Section Editor, Lead Author, and Contributing Author===?=== Lead Author status is given to someone who starts a truly excellent article, or who significantly expands a previously incomplete article, making it into an excellent, usable, and complete article. Contributing Authors are those who write or significantly rework the content. Section Editors are those who review an entry and decide if it is ready to be published, arbitrate disputes, and help set overall editorial policy.

Can I use material published in the OrthopaedicsOne===?=== The text in OrthopaedicsOne is meant to be freely available to users who may copy, modify and distribute that content, so long as the new version grants the same freedoms to others and attributes the content to the authors of the OrthopaedicsOne article used. To achieve this goal, the text contained in OrthopaedicsOne is licensed to the public under the Creative Commons license known as Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 . This license permits anyone to (1) copy, distribute, and display your work, (2) work remix, tweak, and build upon your work, without commercial use of your work, subject to these conditions:

  • Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
  • Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
  • Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one.
  • The full text of the Creative Commons license is available here.

How is OrthopaedicsOne different than Wikipedia===?=== Virtually anyone can add, delete, or change content in Wikipedia. In OrthopaedicsOne, this privilege is restricted to medical students, residents, fellows, surgeons and allied health professionals with an interest in orthopaedic surgery and musculoskeletal health, many of whom are judged by their peers to be experts in their fields.

Content on Wikipedia is determined by the equally-weighted voices of all those who want and choose to contribute. OrthopaedicsOne is part scholarly-democracy and part rigorous-meritocracy. OrthopaedicsOne is democratic in the sense that many content and governance decisions are made with input from many diverse scholars. But, OrthopaedicsOne is also a rigorous meritocracy in the sense that important, overreaching editorial decisions are made by the Managing Editors and the Section Editorsand applied to each and every article.

In Wikipedia, there is a view that the involvement of scholars is not necessary to produce an authoritative article. OrthopaedicsOne is based on the premise that input from scholars is essential to produce trustworthy information about orthopaedic surgery and musculoskeletal health.

Authorship in Wikipedia is anonymous. All work in OrthopaedicsOne is attributed to the individual who did it.

Changes to Wikipedia articles are viewable by the public instantly. Changes to OrthopaedicsOne are viewable instantly, but article versions must be reviewed by a Section Editor.

The restricted access nature of OrthopaedicsOne in combination with the content review process significantly reduces the opportunity and means for bad entries to start in the first place, as well as the length of time they could go undetected.

The taxonomy of OrthopaedicsOne organizes articles according to a logical structure developed by experts.

How will OrthopaedicsOne avoid the quality control problems associated with Wikipedia===?===

We restrict access to the wiki, and hence all authorship, to experts who have been vetted by other members of the editorial workgroup and the Managing Editors .

With the freedom and ability to have entries written and edited by multiple authors, there should be strong self-policing and quality control. The incremental and iterative work on entries by a group of self-organizing experts should produce a higher quality product than a single author could ever produce.

All articles published have to be reviewed and approved by a Section Editor(s).

All work in OrthopaedicsOne is attributed to an individual, not an IP address or a user name as is the policy in Wikipedia. This will motivate individuals to do their very best work, as it does in traditional scholarly work, and will it discourage the explicit acts of sabotage that plague other electronic resources where anonymity is the norm.

الإختلاف مع ويكيتعمر

مراجع