Should geriatric medicine remain a specialty? Yes

من ويكيتعمر
مراجعة 17:36، 1 أكتوبر 2016 بواسطة Ashashyou (نقاش | مساهمات) (أنشأ الصفحة ب' BMJ. 2008 July 12; 337(7661): 78. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39538.481273.AD PMCID: PMC2453251 Should geriatric medicine remain a specialty? Yes Leon Flicker, director See...')
(فرق) → مراجعة أقدم | المراجعة الحالية (فرق) | مراجعة أحدث ← (فرق)
اذهب إلى: تصفح، ابحث

BMJ. 2008 July 12; 337(7661): 78.

doi: 10.1136/bmj.39538.481273.AD

PMCID: PMC2453251

Should geriatric medicine remain a specialty? Yes

Leon Flicker, director

See Should geriatric medicine remain a specialty? No in volume 337 on page 79.

The development of geriatricshas greatly improved care for older people. Leon Flicker believesspecialist care remains important for this vulnerable group,butC P Denaro and A Mudge (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39533.696076.AD) argue that age divisions are no longer relevant

How are specialties of internal medicine determined? Mostly by a focus on individual organs, which reflect the colocation of cellular systems, which have been so arranged by some chance survival advantage common to all mammals. Even within a specific “organology,” individual specialists have a distinct range of expertise based on patients’ and practitioners’ interests, such as interventional versus non-interventional cardiologists. The advantage of subspecialisation, no matter how determined, is clear—it allows the practitioner to focus on specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes that can achieve better patient outcomes. However, for most subspecialties of internal medicine, the evidence for benefit on patient outcomes is lacking. Fortunately, this is not the case for geriatric medicine, and in fact if the specialty of geriatric medicine did not exist, we would be obliged to invent it.

............

رابط[عدل]

http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2453251/