الأحكام الفقهية للأمراض النفسية و طرق علاجها : دراسة مقارنة
��
�.(���# /�% 0�1 ��� �(2( )34(��� �5����� ���" �� 63(�� 6�(748� 69� ���
9� ��� 6����� ;�4(��� <39�� �( =�> � �&�� �� �(#� ���� �
- �4
� �?793� @����� /A ( �# ���� �1(�� � @�3(�B ��"�� ���4 C�"�� @( �D�� 6�.G��� )���H� :6��4 �� �>F 0�A�( �F �>�� � 4�"�� ���� :���� 0� � @(� .6" �G( 64� & :�.17B < �� 6�4�"�� :� (I�
- ����� ���
�
3� �( � +���� �>F J�&F# K�3�� �����L4( M&(� 6�B ��� 6���"�� @( 4�"�� :� (�� J�3�� M&( 6� 9( �. .N�� � @( �"B & � �(B 6��&H� �(9�4� )��� 6�4�"�� :� (H� @( ���&���� 6G39�(�� )���H� @��� .� .6�3��(�� 6�4�"�� N�1��9(��� 6�4�"�� <��" ? �� )�� ���� 6�4�"�� :� (I� 6�3��(�� N�1��9(�� )���# O�A�� ,. .(@1�� )�&��4�� ������ );�(���� ?79�� �6�B ��� 6�* ��) 4�"�� ���� .6����� N�4� &��� 6�B ��� )�39�� ��
6����( .-
- ����� ���
� ���� /3B �@ �G(�� 3�3����
- �
G�4$� P."(�� +���� �>F � +����� Q��� .+���� 6(&G( � @��(��
- ����� �����
3� �(�� K�3�� �.(F# 9� �5 �D� +���� �.��% �� ��� P;��"�� 69� ��� � @�"1�� )���# ��3B <��� @# @�(� )� ��� :� ( @# .�
3� �(� �)�4*# /�% @�"13� ��.G��� )�4G� �4� =�>� �6�(748� � 63(���� �.� � � :� BH� ��3B .S� �>�� )� ��� :� ( R# ���" � @�(� �>.� �?793� QA�� )�� : (�� K����� 6������� �(���# >�2�� � (�4(�� )!7(�� @�"1�� �F� <��(�� @�"1�� @(A .N���"1��� N7(�9(��� N�&��9�� � N�G� @��� ����� N"4��� ?793� QA� �>�� )� ��� :� ( R� @�"1�� @(A ���" � @�(� �>.� �6�"�F>�� :� BH� :9�
��� 6�"�F>�� :� BH� :9� "�9� �>�� :� (�� �3D(� �
- !1��
.)� ��� : (� � ���� 61 & /�% � )� N��! /�� ����� N"4��� ?793� QA� �>�� )� ��� :� ( R? T U7D( ���&�� ��"� � U�(S�"( @�� )� �"��� 6�"�F>�� :� BH� �H 64���"$� ND&� �# �:� BH� ���% N&�9� T U� �D� +&�� �(� .6�.G��� �(���# >�2�� Q�G�(�� @�"1��� �*���% @�(� �>.� � �V ��4 .)3B# ’�� Q�
� D# �� C�.��� 4�"�� ��;��$� : ( @( U7� @# +���3� .S .� 0 �� N$�� =�>�� .5&�&��� N$���� � 6 �� ������ �# J�3���� .+���� � �( �F �(� J�3���� Q�
� �F D# �.� @��>.��� J ���� P�3����� ?79�� !��1� �6�4�"�� 6��&H� �(9�4� 6B� �( +���3� .S .,
� �.��% ��(�� ����A��� M �H� 4�"�� ?79�� < ��
- ��
.��� .+���� ��13�� 0 ��� �?79�� � @1�� )�&��4�� ������ );�(��� 6�B� �( )&B .- .)3B# ’�� .+���� � �.�% ��(�� �� ���� 6�B ��� 6�* 3� �
Abstract
Objectives:
This research is aimed to study the Islamic verdicts related to psychiatric disorders, e.g. responsibility on their acts, Islamic Ebada.
Method:
This study followed the analytic comparative method.
Results:
• The most important results can be summarized in the following points:
• The Islamic verdicts applied to the insanity can be given to schizophrenic patients according to the classification of insanity made by the religious lawyer of Islam (al foqahaa) as follows:
� A schizophrenic patient presented with the typical picture of schizophrenia may be classified as "Mutbiq" insanity; continuous and inseparable, and he takes its verdicts.
� A schizophrenic patient who received treatment and showed some improvement and patients with mild psychotic features may be classified as partial insanity.
� A schizophrenic patient who recover and relapse for any reason may be classified as intermittent insanity and He takes its verdicts.
• Verdicts applied to insanity can not be applied to depressed patients unless their depression became severe and associated with psychotic features as has been detailed within the research.
• Severe cases of Mania can be regarded as insanity and its verdicts can be applied on it. When this disorder occurs episodically it takes the verdicts of intermittent insanity.
• In late stages of dementia, and when it is associated with psychotic features, patient will not be responsible of his
� acts. In other cases, when patient's state is fluctuating, Takleef; responsibility, will vary accordingly. • Islamic verdicts given to comatose patients can be applied to those in delirious state and some cases of epilepsy.
